banner
News center
The loyalty of our customers is a testament to the quality of our merchandise.

IoT-based framework for optimizing energy efficiency and reliability in acoustic sensor networks using mobile sinks | Scientific Reports

Oct 15, 2024

Scientific Reports volume 14, Article number: 24122 (2024) Cite this article

Metrics details

In today’s world, there is an increasing demand for environmental monitoring, surveillance, and oceanographic research, which poses challenges in improving energy efficiency and data transfer reliability in Acoustic Sensor Networks. Existing methods face hurdles due to limited energy resources and unreliable data transmission. We propose a Reliable and Energy-Efficient Framework with Sink Mobility (REEFSM) to address these issues. This framework optimizes energy consumption and enhances data reliability by incorporating advanced energy management strategies such as adaptive duty cycling and efficient data transmission mechanisms by minimizing forwarding nodes. Simulation results demonstrate that REEFSM reduces energy consumption by up to 43% and increases data reliability by 35% compared to protocols like EERBCR and DEADS. REEFSM ensures zero dead nodes, minimizes packet drops, and maintains high data accuracy throughout the simulation. This research outcome provides a sustainable and reliable solution for energy-efficient data collection in underwater environments. The future research directions, including integrating autonomous path planning, energy harvesting, and machine learning techniques, hold great potential for further advancements in the field.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWSNs) due to their remarkable potential for various applications within aquatic environments. These applications include underwater exploration, environmental monitoring, oceanographic research, and offshore enterprises. UWSNs utilize acoustic waves for communication, as radio signals are ineffective underwater due to significant attenuation and dispersion. Although optical waves have been suggested as an alternative, their efficacy is limited by attenuation and dispersion, rendering them less viable for long-distance communication in murky water environments1. The critical challenge in UWSNs lies in optimizing energy efficiency and network longevity due to the constrained battery capacity of sensor nodes. Underwater communication, sensing, data forwarding, and processing consume substantial energy, necessitating the development of energy-efficient protocols and techniques. The need for energy-efficient solutions is further emphasized by the considerable energy consumption involved in these activities2. Nevertheless, the distinctive characteristics of submerged habitats give rise to several obstacles. The need to optimize network lifetime arises due to the constrained battery capacity of sensor nodes, hence requiring the creation of energy-efficient protocols and techniques. The significance of maximizing energy utilization, including hardware design and networking protocols, is highlighted by the considerable energy consumption in underwater communication, sensing, data forwarding, and processing3. Additionally, absorption and scattering reduce the amplitude of acoustic waves as they travel through a medium. High-frequency attenuation is faster, restricting acoustic wave distance and significantly impacting routing and communication protocol development. Therefore, technologies that reduce latency and provide quick and reliable data transport are essential. Noise and interference mitigation are crucial to underwater communication reliability4. Research and development are motivated by the challenges of enhancing UWSNs to satisfy the requirements of aquatic applications. Network longevity is constrained by reliance on forwarder nodes, network topology, node density and deployment techniques, node failure, overloaded nodes, infrastructure, and protocols. A limited number of forwarder nodes can restrict network operation and result in several complications. This study hypothesizes that implementing mobile sinks in a well-structured network architecture can significantly reduce energy consumption and enhance data reliability in UWSNs. By minimizing the need for intermediary nodes and optimizing sensor node wake-up and sleep cycles, REEFSM is expected to extend the network’s lifespan and improve overall performance5. This study hypothesizes that implementing mobile sinks in a well-structured network architecture can significantly reduce energy consumption and enhance data reliability in UWSNs. By minimizing the need for intermediary nodes and optimizing sensor node wake-up and sleep cycles6., REEFSM is expected to extend the network’s lifespan and improve overall performance. Author7 proposes a centralized control-based clustering scheme to enhance energy efficiency in underwater networks by optimizing node deployment and duty cycling.

Current protocols like EERBCR and DEADS have improved energy efficiency and data reliability in UWSNs. However, these protocols often rely on stationary sink nodes, leading to unbalanced energy consumption and inefficiencies. For instance, stationary surface sinks may hinder protocols like EEDBR from covering all data, and predetermined mobile sink patterns in EERBCR still leave room for improvement in energy management during sensor node operations. Moreover, these protocols do not adequately address the unique characteristics of UWSNs, such as node mobility and the Doppler effect, which impact the calculation of performance metrics and overall network scalability8. A data-model fusion-driven method approach combines the advantages of data-based and model-based methods to improve prediction accuracy and reduce computational expense9. Existing approaches assume accurate AUV models and do not consider parameter uncertainties; new control strategies need to be developed for uncertain heterogeneous AUV systems7.

This research addresses these gaps by proposing a novel framework that leverages mobile sinks for direct communication with sensor nodes. This reduces the reliance on forwarder nodes and improves energy efficiency and reliability. The proposed REEFSM framework aims to overcome the limitations of existing methods by ensuring balanced energy consumption, reducing packet loss, and maintaining high data accuracy throughout the network’s operation.

The primary motivation behind this research is to develop an energy-efficient routing framework that can balance energy consumption among sensor nodes, thereby enhancing the reliability and longevity of UWSNs. Existing methods often result in unbalanced energy consumption, where some nodes deplete their energy faster than others, leading to network partitions and reduced performance. This study addresses these issues by proposing a Reliable and Energy-Efficient Framework with Sink Mobility (REEFSM). REEFSM optimizes energy consumption and enhances data reliability by incorporating advanced energy management strategies such as adaptive duty cycling and efficient data transmission mechanisms. By optimizing energy usage and balancing the energy load, the framework facilitates:

Direct Communication with Mobile Sinks. The framework facilitates direct communication between sensor nodes and mobile sinks by employing four mobile sinks, each located centrally within their designated zones. This strategic placement minimizes the need for intermediary nodes, thereby improving reliability and reducing packet loss ratios.

Energy Conservation and Extended Network Lifespan. Reducing the reliance on forwarder nodes helps conserve energy and extend the network’s lifespan. The framework optimizes the wake-up and sleep cycles of sensor nodes, activated only by sink nodes’ broadcast messages (Hello and Bye). This strategy minimizes energy consumption by avoiding unnecessary relay node usage and employing relay nodes only when necessary.

Enhanced Network Architecture: The framework divides the network into four distinct regions, each further subdivided into three horizontal segments. This structured division and the strategic placement of mobile sinks ensure balanced coverage and minimize latency. The network architecture is further enhanced by optimizing sensor node listening, wake-up, and sleep cycles, reducing energy consumption.

Neighbor Discovery and Packet Forwarding Algorithms: The proposed algorithms facilitate direct communication between sensor nodes and geographically proximate mobile sinks, bypassing the need for relay nodes. These algorithms reduce the number of cycles that sensor nodes complete, further conserving energy and enhancing network reliability.

Section 2 presents a literature review. Section 3 elaborates on the proposed system model and framework. Section 4 contains results, analysis, and discussions. Section 5 discusses conclusions and future work.

Most underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) send data packets to surface-level sink nodes using depth-based routing (DBR). Nodes near sinks waste DBR energy by relaying data packets. In response, EEDBR was founded. This protocol evaluates node energy to divide network energy when building routing paths. Stationary surface sinks may hinder EEDBR from covering all data. Moveable sink nodes with predetermined patterns cover three locations on each route in EERBCR, boosting energy efficiency. Coverage gaps are eliminated by linking all sensor nodes in a region to a sink node. Energy management during sensor node operations reduces EERBCR’s efficiency. Sensor nodes must efficiently flip between dormant and active states for low-energy sink signals. Energy consumption during state transitions, especially waking and sleeping, dramatically impacts network energy efficiency. Energy management research by EERBCR is needed to improve UWSN performance10. The unequal energy utilization in underwater wireless sensor networks results from the uneven distribution of nodes across different depths. The energy-efficient data collecting system (EEDG) has been developed to tackle the difficulties effectively by employing a three-step procedure. The nodes are arranged into smaller clusters and supervised by temporary forwarder nodes. The primary duty of forwarder nodes is to gather data from a designated subset of nodes over a one-hop connection in each iteration. Network nodes transmit their data solely to designated forwarder nodes within specific intervals. The utilization of graph structure has been found to significantly mitigate the latency in collecting data over the entire network. The accomplishment is attained by utilizing a mobile sink that encounters forwarder nodes by their designated degree inside the graph. The effectiveness of the Energy Efficient Data Gathering (EEDG) mechanism is assessed in terms of its energy usage, end-to-end delay, and throughput4. The EH-ARCUN Protocol delineates a streamlined method for transmitting data, outlining a coordination mechanism between the source and relay nodes. Additionally, it elucidates the integration of piezoelectric energy harvesting and relay nodes. The user examines the influence of harvesting parameters (duration, stability, delivery ratio) on network performance. They conducted a comparative analysis of EH-ARCUN, ARCUN, and RACE regarding energy consumption and performance. It fails to tackle the issue of empty spaces or changing network structures. The energy harvesting model may necessitate more refinement11.

The CR-NBEER Protocol outlines the functioning of cooperative relaying and the selection procedure based on surrounding information. The remaining energy and the density of nodes determine the selection parameters for relays. The authors Examine the effects of CR-NBEER on network longevity, power usage, and delivery success rate. Analyzes the performance metrics of CR-NBEER, EEUC, and M-CBR. There is a deficiency in the investigation of incorporating energy harvesting systems. There may be a need for systems that facilitate the interchange of data and the discovery of neighboring entities12. A technique employing mobile autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) as intermediaries to alleviate gaps in coverage. The technique being discussed is a relay selection system focusing on distance and energy efficiency. Evaluates the proposed method and technique for network coverage, energy efficiency, and the duration required to fix gaps in coverage. The proposed method is being compared against static anchor-based methods. Specifics may be required for coordination tactics and AUV movement patterns. Additional research is needed to determine how much the approach can be scaled up to accommodate larger networks8. The cooperative routing process is significantly challenged by the dynamic movement of sensor nodes in response to water currents. The proposed methodology incorporates sensor nodes’ spatial coordinates and vertical placement to ascertain the most advantageous destination nodes. Integrating these two attributes does not necessitate familiarity with the positional coordinates of the nodes but rather prioritizes the selection of destination nodes near the water surface. In addition, it should be noted that a source node is responsible for choosing both a relay node and a destination node. Moreover, the source node expects to receive acknowledgment regarding the successful reception or retransmission of the data packets13. The purpose of single-hop clustering methods is to provide direct communication between the cluster head and the base station. The proposed study aims to improve data transmission efficiency through multi-hop clustering. The process entails the choice of Relay Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (Relay-AUV) according to parameters such as minimizing latency and maximizing channel capacity in acoustic wireless communication. The data transmission rate demonstrates a notable increase in successive transmission rate, throughput, cost of execution time, and packet delivery ratio. The proposed CB-BG mechanism exhibits improved efficiency and dependability in communication14. The research methodology employed in this study successfully addresses the issue of transmission loss by decreasing the distance over which the signal is carried. The initial method employs a unique selection strategy based on the principles of Boltzmann distribution. The primary aim of the second method is to improve the solutions obtained by the preceding algorithm by minimizing transmission loss. The observation has been made that an efficient allocation of sensor nodes to a chosen group of relays can be achieved in polynomial time by rephrasing a certain aspect of the problem as a bipartite matching problem with minimal cost5. This study introduces a novel Cooperative Ray Optimization (CoROA) technique to mitigate the adverse impacts of geometric spreading and Doppler effects in underwater acoustic networks, thereby minimizing packet loss and delay. The existing approaches effectively handle the tasks of routing and energy management inside an underwater network, considering the variables of temperature and salinity. The CoROA approach enhances many performance metrics, including packet delivery optimization, throughput improvement, latency reduction, and packet drop mitigation. This is achieved by leveraging multiple pathways across relay nodes to reach the intended destination node11 efficiently15. A topology optimization strategy based on a minimum-weighted rigid graph is developed for sensor deployment. A mechanism is developed at the local level for each sensor node to transmit the acquired data to the data collectors (sinks) by utilizing the most efficient network topology. The Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) is designed using a dynamic value-based path planning methodology, which enables it to navigate and visit data collectors efficiently. This technique aims to optimize information value (VoI) utilization within a specified period16. The primary goal of this study is to devise and execute an efficient strategy for positioning relay nodes to improve the durability of underwater acoustic sensor networks. Incorporating a relay node to increase the operational lifespan of a crucial node is a significant consideration in optimizing network longevity. Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that the energy consumption of the relay node also constitutes a constraining element. The weighted sum strategy is employed to amalgamate the objectives mentioned earlier into a cohesive objective by allocating weights17. The Internet of Underwater Things (IoUTs) is widely acknowledged as a substantial technological achievement within intelligent marine environments. In recent times, there has been an increasing scholarly focus on examining relay node placement (RNP) as a strategy to augment the longevity of networks. The problem of minimizing redundant relay nodes in densely populated underwater acoustic sensor networks (UASNs) is characterized by short inter-node distances. The Modified Difference Convex Approach (MoDCA) is introduced and evaluated in comparison to two current methodologies, namely the Difference Convex Approach (DCA) and the Robust Interval Analysis (RIA). The assessment is predicated upon two primary criteria: the mean quantity of relay nodes (NoR a ) and the duration of network functionality18. The primary obstacle underwater sensor networks encounter is energy depletion within the sensor nodes. This paper uses the Ant Lion optimization algorithm (ALOA) to improve the durability of the underwater wireless sensor network, collect data from sensor nodes inside sub-clusters, and decrease the transmission distance of relay nodes via multi-hop communication. The subaquatic network region is imagined as a three-dimensional arrangement of concentric cylinders of many levels. Within each stage, multiple blocks correspond to specific clusters19. The protocol utilizes the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to rank relay nodes. The FAHP strategy, as depicted in this hierarchical diagram, was employed to select the most advantageous relay node from a pool of potential candidates. Random node deployment in 3D UWSNs is described in the study, along with the deployment zone, minimum node separation, and surface gateway nodes. The authors suggest using the Saaty importance scale to rank FAHP requirements in order of importance. As illustrated in article tables and figures, the FAHP system implements the distance, hops, and neighbor’s criterion. When analyzing the proposed routing protocol, the authors assess energy consumption, average hops, collisions, and gateway node latency20. The proposed system utilizes a fitness function derived from a multi-objective optimization algorithm to determine Cluster Head (CH) positions. The method calculates CH allocations for an energy-balanced network sequentially. The fitness function considers neighbor number ratios, energy, and CH distance. CH candidates with higher fitness values are superior. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) method is implemented to optimize the selection of CH positions. PSO determines the optimal CH site by calculating fitness using extant CH nodes. PSO determines the optimal two-dimensional CH position space solution by modifying the flight trajectories of particles by individual and global best practices. The method uses PSO optimization and a CH location selection algorithm to establish an energy-balanced network. This research increases the lifespan and efficacy of underwater sensor networks4.The presence of a lone relay node has a significant impact on the reliability of the network. Therefore, incorporating collaborative strategies is crucial in facilitating the transmission of information from the origin to the target. The challenges associated with a solitary relay node were successfully mitigated by utilizing the sink mobility mechanism in the RACE-SM system. If the sink node is situated inside the communication range, all sensor nodes will directly communicate data to it. Cooperative combining techniques by sensor nodes facilitate data transmission from the source node to the destination or sink node within sensor networks21. Table 1 shows a comparison of the existing method with the proposed framework.

The author developed the 3U network for cooperative underwater target hunting in a multi-task cooperation event and presented an energy-efficient target-hunting model for positioning the UAV and optimizing the trajectory of the UUV as well as the connectivity between them. To solve the target hunting issues, Deep Q-Network (DQN) algorithms are employed26.

The Author proposes to minimize energy consumption by considering the trajectory of AUV, resource management, and Ae of Information (AoI). For AUV path planning, it uses PSO, while a two-stage Lyapunov optimization algorithm that considers both energy efficiency and system queue performance is used27.

In this article, the peak AoI is considered as the key performance metric to be minimized, thus adopting a limited-service M/G/1 vacation queueing model to evaluate information transfers and determine the number of AUVs in the queue. Moreover, an adaptive algorithm is devised to change the value of the queuing length limit28.

The framework was developed to reduce the uneven energy consumption caused by the overuse of specific relay nodes. The advantage of mobile sinks is that they spread the energy load evenly across the network. This approach improves reliability by reducing packet loss and minimizes the hops needed for data transmission, ensuring stable communication paths. Additionally, REEFSM extends the network’s lifespan by optimizing the sleep-wake cycles of sensor nodes and reducing reliance on energy-hungry relay nodes. Mobile sinks also boost data collection efficiency by providing continuous and reliable data streams, enhancing the network’s overall performance.

The proposed network architecture is a two-dimensional model adapted from previous research, considering the dynamic and challenging underwater environment. The network is divided into four regions, each further segmented into three sections. Mobile sink nodes are strategically placed at the geographical midpoint of each zone, ensuring minimal transmission distance and reducing the need for intermediary nodes, as shown in Fig. 1.

Proposed 2D Model, Sensor Nodes(blue) and Sink nodes (red).

Four mobile sink nodes are positioned centrally within a zone and moving horizontally. A two-dimensional network and methodology determine the locations of all sensor nodes in underwater sensor networks. This approach is consistent with the previous research work and focuses explicitly on improving the deficiencies highlighted in EERBCR by Gul et al. (2021). There are three-dimensional networks, but a two-dimensional model has been adapted based on previous research and ensures successful system dependability and energy conservation without compromising performance. This scenario virtually shows mobile sink nodes as Cluster Heads (CHs) in underwater sensor networks but also reduces transmission distance among sensor nodes and with sink nodes. It conserves energy while effectively carrying out CH responsibilities owing to its infinite battery backup and processing capabilities. Deployment of mobile sink nodes as cluster heads (CHs) in various strategic positions of zones enhances the reliability and scalability of the network. It guarantees constant connectivity and dynamically avoids intermediate sensor node operation. Deploying mobile sink nodes strategically in each zone as cluster heads effectively improves energy consumption and network reliability.

All communication phases in the proposed framework are illustrated as shown in Fig. 2 And explained below in detail.

Proposed Framework Phases.

N is the set of all sensor nodes, M is the set of all sink nodes, and the Network area is A × A. Each region \(\:{\varvec{R}}_{\varvec{k}}\) is divided into three sections. Equation (1) gives the sink node position, and Eqs. (1) and (2) show the energy consumption of N.

Identification of nearby nodes is illustrated below and described in Table 2. Each sensor node identifies and establishes connections with its neighboring nodes.

Initialization: Each node i ∈ N has an initial neighbor list Ni = ∅.

Broadcast Hello Message: Each node i broadcasts a Hello message containing its ID and position if Ei> 0.

Distance Calculation: When node j receives a Hello message from node i, it calculates the distance dij.

Neighbor List Update: Node j updates its neighbor list if dij ≤ R and i ∈/ Nj.

Acknowledgment: Node i receives the acknowledgment from node j and updates its neighbor list if \(j\not\in Ni.\)

N is the updated Neighbor list of sensor node i.

Packet Forwarding and Dropping manages the transmission of data packets within the network, ensuring efficient use of energy and reliable data delivery, as illustrated below and shown in Table 3. This process includes initialization, packet forwarding, and packet dropping.

Initialization: Each node calculates its distance to all sink nodes and identifies the closest one.

For each node N \(\:i\:\in\:N\), \(\:\:\:{d}_{\left\{is\right\}}=\:\sqrt{{\left(\left({x}_{i}-{x}_{s}\right)\right.}^{2}-\left.{\left({y}_{i}-{y}_{s}\right)}^{2}\right)}\:\:\:\:{\forall\:}_{s\:\in\:\:S}\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:,\) Closest sink nodes \(\:{d}_{is*}=\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{min}{s\in\:S}\:{d}_{is}\)

Packet Forwarding: The sensor node can reach its closest sink node (within transmission range) and transmit the packet directly. Otherwise, the node forwards the packet to a neighbor that minimizes the distance to the sink node. Energy utilization is counted for the transmitting node and the forwarding neighbor.

Packet Dropping: If a node cannot find a neighbor or sink node within transmission range, it drops the packet. A node with zero energy is marked as dead and can no longer participate in packet forwarding.

The concept of timeliness and latency in the REEFSM framework is described in the structured algorithm, as shown in Table 4, The algorithm provides details on the envisaged improvements to REEFSM, which help alleviate data latency through appropriate sink placement, prioritization of data packets, and enhanced data freshness in IoT applications, especially real-time monitoring applications.

Based on the simulation results, this section provides a detailed performance analysis of the SEERDF Framework with Sink Mobility (REEFSM). The study covers multiple dimensions, including packets sent, packets dropped, and network energy. The proposed methodology is implemented in Python with values given in Table 4.

The proposed protocol is compared with29 EERBCR: Energy-efficient regional-based cooperative routing protocol for underwater sensor networks with sink mobility and24 DEADS is a depth and Energy-Aware Dominating Set-Based Algorithm for Cooperative Routing along with Sink Mobility in Underwater WSNs (Table 5).

The attenuation and absorption loss are calculated using the simplified Thorp model by counting underwater conditions. In Eq. (9), Signal (f) is for frequency, and (V) is a function that describes the attenuation and absorption loss experienced during the propagation of an acoustic wave over a distance of (D).

V is the signal loss (absorption) in dB, A stands for the coefficient of absorption while a signal is propagating underwater and is measured in decibels per kilometer, The acoustic wave frequency, f, is given in kilo hertz and D stands for propagation distance, or the number of kilometers between the source and destination nodes.

When the frequency range exceeds 0.4, the model’s Eq. (10) is applied.

If the frequency range is smaller or below 0.4, the following formula, as given in Eq. (11), is employed.

The absorption loss is reported in dB/km, whereas the frequency f is measured in KHz.

Sensor nodes send packets and consume energy, which is indicated by E(Tx). E(Rx) denotes the power a node consumes while receiving packets. Equation (12) is defined in detail to understand and design protocols that are energy efficient and use the least amount of energy.

E(Tx) packet transmission Consumption of energy. E(Tx) is the energy consumed in Joules for packet transmission across ocean water across an assigned channel. P(Tx) is the power the transmitting node requires in watts to transfer the packet to the destination. V represents the signal attenuation factor, with low attenuation causing its value to increase and high attenuation causing its value to fall. Bandwidth (BW) denotes the acoustic wave channel frequencies used to transport data to its destination.

Equation (13) represents the energy the receiving sensor node uses to receive packets in Joules. P(Rx) measures the wattage required to process packets and receive data. E is a sensor node’s overall energy use for a specific period, expressed in Joules. P stands for the rate of work or energy consumption. E(Rx) in Joules equals P(Rx) in watts times the time in seconds. V and BW represent the accessible frequency band and the inversely proportionate absorption loss of the communication channel.

Based on the simulation results, this section provides a detailed performance analysis of the Reliable and Energy-Efficient Regional Routing Framework with Sink Mobility (REEFSM). The study covers multiple dimensions, including packets sent, packets dropped, network energy, dead nodes, alive nodes, packets received, the packet received ratio, and packet drop ratio, as shown in Table 6.

The number of packets sent and received provides traffic capacity and data delivery efficiency. Over 1000 rounds, the number of packets sent increased steadily, reaching a maximum of 64,235 packets. Correspondingly, the packets received also showed a consistent increase, with the highest value being 60,090 packets at 1000 rounds. These indicate the robustness of the Proposed Framework for ensuring reliable data transmission. The packets dropped represent the number of packets that failed to reach the sink nodes. Throughout the simulation, the number of packets dropped increased gradually, which is expected as network traffic grows. However, the Packet Drop Ratio remained relatively low, peaking at 0.0917, demonstrating the framework’s efficiency in minimizing packet loss. The initial network energy was 944 joules at round 100, which decreased progressively to 536 joules after 1000 rounds. This decline is indicative of energy expenditure due to data transmission and reception. Despite this, the network maintained balanced energy usage, which is essential in prolonging the network’s operational lifetime. The number of alive nodes remained constant at 100, and no dead nodes were recorded. This consistency underscores the effectiveness of REEFSM in maintaining node vitality, which is essential for network stability and longevity. The Packet Drop Ratio remained low, indicating efficient handling of network traffic and minimal packet loss. The performance analysis demonstrated efficiency and reliability. The framework consistently maintained low packet drop ratios and balanced energy consumption. Additionally, the network stability was affirmed by the constant number of alive nodes throughout the simulation rounds. These results validate the effectiveness of REEFSM in enhancing the performance of UAN.

REEFSM consistently shows higher total network energy than other protocols throughout the simulation rounds, indicating its efficiency in energy consumption. By the end of 1000 rounds, REEFSM maintains 536 joules of energy, whereas other protocols, like DBR and EEDBR, deplete their energy completely. EERBCR Shows a steady and linear decline in energy levels, indicating consistent energy consumption. DEADS Exhibits a sharper decline, suggesting higher energy consumption over time. DBR Experiences the steepest drop, reaching zero energy by round 1000, indicating it is the least energy-efficient protocol. EEDBR Similar to DBR, it depletes energy quickly, reaching zero by round 900.REEFSM Maintains higher energy levels over time, ending with 536 joules at round 1000, indicating superior energy efficiency as shown in Fig. 3.

Comparative Analysis of Total Remaining Energy of Network.

The number of packets REEFSM receives is higher than EERBCR, DEADS, DBR, and EEDBR. However, this indicates a more conservative and efficient data transmission strategy and prioritizes energy savings and network longevity mechanisms over other protocols. EERBCR Shows a reliable increase in packet send count, reaching 60,000 by round 1000. DEADS Demonstrates substantial throughput, with packet send numbers reaching 63,000 by round 1000. DBR Sends fewer packets than others, peaking at 50,000 by round 1000. EEDBR Has the lowest throughput, with packet send numbers peaking at 30,000 by round 1000. REEFSM Exhibits the highest throughput, with packet send numbers reaching 64,235 by round 1000, as shown in Fig. 4.

The packets sent to sink node.

The Innovative Framework exhibits significantly lower packets dropped compared to other protocols, as shown in Fig. 5. This demonstrates its superior reliability and effectiveness in maintaining robust communication channels and reducing data loss. EERBCR shows a steady increase in packet drops, reaching 40,000 by round 1000. DEADS Has a slightly higher packet drop rate than EERBCR, reaching 41,000 by round 1000. DBR Exhibits the highest packet drop rate, with 42,000 drops by round 1000. EEDBR Shows a moderate packet drop rate, with 30,000 drops by round 1000. REEFSM Demonstrates the lowest packet drop rate, with 5888 drops by round 1000. Regarding packet drop, REEFSM is the most reliable protocol with the lowest packet drop rate. EEDBR shows moderate reliability, while EERBCR and DEADS exhibit higher packet drop rates. DBR is the least trustworthy, with the highest packet drop rate.

Number of Packet Drop.

The Reliable and Energy-Efficient Framework with Sink Mobility (REEFSM) enhanced acoustic communication by reducing energy consumption by 43% and improving reliability by 35% compared to existing methods and schemes. It achieves balanced energy usage, minimal packet drops, and high data accuracy. Using mobile sinks and optimized node cycles extends network lifetime and efficiency.

The research presented an IoT-based framework to minimize energy utilization and improve acoustic communication reliability. Simulation results highlight that REEFSM outperforms existing protocols, achieving a 43% reduction in energy consumption and a 35% increase in data reliability compared to EERBCR and DEADS. The framework ensures zero dead nodes, minimizes packet drops, and maintains high data accuracy. The consistent performance across various metrics, including network energy, packet transmission, and packet drop rates, underscores the robustness and reliability of REEFSM.

Future research should further explore integrating advanced optimization techniques such as autonomous path planning, energy harvesting, and machine learning to enhance network longevity and efficiency. These advancements promise to provide sustainable energy solutions and optimize real-time network operations, thereby pushing the boundaries of what is achievable in underwater sensor networks.

The data supporting this study’s findings are available on request from the corresponding author.

Shah, S. M. et al. Advancements in neighboring-based energy-efficient routing protocol (NBEER) for underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Sens. (Basel). 23 (13). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136025 (2023).

Ayaz, M., Ammad-Uddin, M., Sharif, Z., Hijji, M. & Mansour, A. A hybrid data collection scheme to achieve load balancing for underwater sensor networks. J. King. Saud. Univ. Comput. Inform. Sci.35(3), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JKSUCI.2023.02.006 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Kaveripakam, S. & Chinthaginjala, R. Energy balanced reliable and effective clustering for underwater wireless sensor networks. Alexandria Eng. J.77, 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEJ.2023.06.083 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Hu, Y., Hu, K., Liu, H. & Wan, X. An energy-balanced head nodes selection scheme for underwater mobile sensor networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw.1, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13638-022-02141-3/FIGURES/8 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Tam, N. T., Dung, D. A., Hung, T. H., Binh, H. T. T. & Yu, S. Exploiting relay nodes for maximizing wireless underground sensor network lifetime. Appl Intell.50(12), 4568–4585. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10489-020-01735-Y (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Roy, A. & Sarma, N. A synchronous duty-cycled reservation-based MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Digit. Commun. Networks. 7 (3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DCAN.2020.09.002 (2021).

Chen, B., Hu, J., Zhao, Y. & Ghosh, B. K. Finite-time observer-based tracking control of uncertain heterogeneous underwater vehicles using adaptive sliding mode approach. Neurocomputing. 481, 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2022.01.038 (2022).

Kim, J. Three dimensional tracking of a maneuvering emitter utilizing doppler-bearing measurements of a constant velocity observer. Sig. Process.189https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SIGPRO.2021.108246 (2021).

Yang, M., Han, W., Song, Y., Wang, Y. & Yang, S. Data-model fusion driven intelligent rapid response design of underwater gliders. Adv. Eng. Inform.61, 102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2024.102569 (2024).

Gul, H., Ullah, G., Khan, M. & Khan, Y. Energy-efficient regional based cooperative routing protocol for underwater sensor networks with sink mobility. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.14 (5), 6063–6075. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12652-020-02781-7 (2023).

Khan, A., Khan, M., Ahmed, S., Rahman, M. A. A. & Khan, M. Energy harvesting based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. PLoS One. 14 (7). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0219459 (2019).

Hussain, A. et al. CR-NBEER: Cooperative-Relay neighboring-based energy efficient routing protocol for Marine Underwater Sensor Networks. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071474 (2023).

Khan, A., Ali, I., Rahman, A. U., Imran, M., Mahmood, H. & Fazal-E-Amin, and Co-EEORS: Cooperative Energy efficient optimal relay selection protocol for underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Access.6, 28777–28789. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2837108 (2018).

Priyadarshini, R. R. & Sivakumar, N. Relay Selection Approach in Underwater Acoustic WSNs Using Bi-Partite Graph. Wirel. Pers. Commun.111(1), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11277-019-06877-Y (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Rajeswari, A., Duraipandian, N., Shanker, N. R. & Samuel, B. E. Efficient Optimization Algorithms for Minimizing Delay and Packet Loss in Doppler and Geometric Spreading Environment in Underwater Sensor Networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun.121(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11277-021-08623-9 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Yan, J., Yang, X., Luo, X. & Chen, C. Energy-Efficient Data Collection Over AUV-Assisted Underwater Acoustic Sensor Network. IEEE. Syst. J.12(4), 3519–3530. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2017.2789283 (2018).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Mohammadi, Z., Soleimanpour-Moghadam, M., Askarizadeh, M. & Talebi, S. Increasing the Lifetime of Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: Difference Convex Approach. IEEE. Syst. J.14(3), 3214–3224. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2959046 (2020).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Mohammadi, Z. Modified Relay Node Placement in dense 3D Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks, in 2022 9th Iranian Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems (CFIS), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CFIS54774.2022.9756474 (2022).

Kumar, R. S. & Sivaradje, G. Energy Aware Node deployment using Ant Lion optimization algorithm in underwater acoustic sensor Network, in 2023 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTSN57873.2023.10151482 (2023).

Pabani, J. K., Luque-Nieto, M. Á., Hyder, W. & Ariza, A. Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Selecting Relay Nodes in Underwater Sensor Networks Based on Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. Sens 202222(22), 8930. https://doi.org/10.3390/S22228930 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Ahmad, I. et al. RACE-SM: Reliability and adaptive cooperation for efficient UWSNs using sink mobility. Front. Mar. Sci. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2022.1030113 (2022).

Yan, H., Shi, Z. J. & Cui, J. H. DBR: Depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 4982 LNCS, pp. 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79549-0_7 (2008).

Wahid, A., Lee, S., Jeong, H. J. & Kim, D. Energy-efficient depth-based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Commun. Comput. Inform. Sci.195 CCIS, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24267-0_27 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Umar, A. et al. Jun., DEADS: depth and energy-aware dominating set based algorithm for cooperative routing along with sink mobility in underwater WSNs. Sensors.15(6), 14458–14486. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150614458 (2015).

Article ADS MathSciNet PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nasir, H. et al. Jan., CoDBR: Cooperative depth based routing for underwater wireless sensor networks, Proceedings – 2014 9th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications, BWCCA 2014, pp. 52–57, https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2014.45 (2014).

Wei, W. et al. 3U: Joint Design of UAV-USV-UUV Networks for Cooperative Target Hunting. IEEE. Trans. Veh. Technol.72(3), 4085–4090. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2022.3220856 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Fang, Z. et al. Stochastic Optimization-Aided Energy-Efficient Information Collection in Internet of Underwater Things Networks. IEEE. Internet. Things. J.9(3), 1775–1789. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3088279 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Fang, Z., Wang, J., Jiang, C., Zhang, Q. & Ren, Y. AoI-Inspired Collaborative Information Collection for AUV-Assisted Internet of Underwater Things. IEEE Internet Things J.8(19), 14559–14571. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3049239 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Gul, H., Ullah, G., Khan, M. & Khan, Y. EERBCR: Energy-efficient regional based cooperative routing protocol for underwater sensor networks with sink mobility. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.14 (5), 6063–6075. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12652-020-02781-7/FIGURES/9 (2023).

Download references

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology International, Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Shujaat Ali & Muhammad Nadeem

IQRA National University Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

Sheeraz Ahmed

Kardan University, Kabul, Afghanistan

Muhamad Tahir

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

“S.A, M.N, S.A. and M.T. wrote the main manuscript text and S.A. prepared all Figs. 1-3 and Tables. All authors reviewed the manuscript.”

Correspondence to Muhamad Tahir.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Ali, S., Nadeem, M., Ahmed, S. et al. IoT-based framework for optimizing energy efficiency and reliability in acoustic sensor networks using mobile sinks. Sci Rep 14, 24122 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74664-2

Download citation

Received: 08 March 2024

Accepted: 27 September 2024

Published: 15 October 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74664-2

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative